Compare Padel Alba court models for Canadian projects: Alba, Full Panoramic, Panoramic and Panoramic 125.
Start with your site and the people using the court. WCSI helps private homeowners and municipalities work through the choice, with support also available for clubs, schools and developers.
Start with the location, intended use and available site information. A private court and a municipal facility may have different priorities for circulation, surrounding spaces and operations. Clubs and other facilities can add their own spectator and layout requirements to the discussion.
All four models belong in the comparison. If you have not yet decided on padel for the site, read padel court planning first. A model name or a manufacturer image is a starting point; the selected configuration, approved drawings and local technical review establish what can be proposed for your site.
Compare the models using matching views and the same questions. Look at the structure, glazing, access, playing surface, lighting and finishes, then consider the foundations, delivery and installation work needed around the court package.
Jump to: Alba · Full Panoramic · Panoramic · Panoramic 125 · Compare models
Alba is a framed court option to consider when reviewing the appearance and layout of the facility. Examine the relationship between the frame, glazed areas and surrounding space using the current manufacturer drawings and approved images.
For a private setting, consider how the court sits alongside access routes and the rest of the property. For a municipal facility, review its relationship with circulation and neighbouring recreation areas. Use the same site plan when comparing Alba with the panoramic options.
The aim is to identify which configuration suits the project brief. Avoid selecting a model before the complete footprint and installation requirements have been checked.
Confirm the current Canadian package, structure, glass options, finishes, surface and lighting. Review foundations and anchoring against the selected configuration and the site requirements before procurement.
Consider Full Panoramic when sightlines and the visual relationship between the court and its surroundings matter to the project. Review approved views of the court from the playing area, spectator areas and nearby circulation routes.
A panoramic appearance should be assessed together with the practical layout. Identify where people will enter, watch and move around the court, and where adjoining facilities or equipment are planned.
Compare Full Panoramic and Panoramic on matching drawings. Their names and similar marketing photographs do not establish the exact structural or package differences.
Confirm frame geometry, glazing, access openings, surface, lighting and finish options in the proposed package. Ask for the drawings and technical information that apply to that configuration, then review the site requirements before deciding.
Panoramic is another option to compare when planning how the playing area relates to the wider venue. Use current manufacturer information to understand the balance of structure and glazing in the actual configuration offered.
Compare the model with Full Panoramic using the same site layout, viewpoints and package checklist. Ask which differences affect the appearance, installation scope or operating plan for your project.
For homeowners and municipalities alike, the useful comparison is the proposed court within the complete site. Keep access, circulation, surrounding areas and maintenance needs in that review.
Review the structural layout, glazing, selected playing surface, lighting and finishes. Confirm the exact model differences with Padel Alba rather than inferring a specification from the model name.
Padel Alba positions Panoramic 125 for demanding outdoor conditions. Treat it as a candidate for technical review at an exposed site; the model name does not establish suitability for a particular location in Canada.
Share the site location and intended operating season early. Discuss exposure, drainage and the surrounding environment alongside the court layout. For a covered proposal, keep the building or canopy scope separate so it can be reviewed on its own terms.
Do not interpret “125” as a confirmed wind rating, dimension or structural specification. Ask for the current documentation for the package being considered.
Review current drawings, structural sections, glass, foundations and anchoring with the relevant technical input. Any wind, snow or other structural information must relate to the actual configuration and site.
Use this checklist to request comparable information for every model. The entries describe what to request from the supplier; they are not a technical rating or an approved package specification.
| Comparison item | What to request for each model |
|---|---|
| Current drawings and datasheet | The dated manufacturer drawings and datasheet for the model and configuration being quoted |
| Structure, glass and access | The proposed frame, glass and entrance configuration |
| Surface, lighting and finishes | The surface, lighting and finish options included or excluded |
| Dimensions and construction footprint | A drawing showing the court, circulation and complete construction footprint |
| Steel sections and glass specification | The structural sections and glass specification for the selected configuration |
| Wind and snow design information | Design information for your location, reviewed by a qualified engineer |
For all four models, also confirm the complete footprint, foundation requirements, engineering input, freight responsibilities, warranty terms, maintenance information and spare-parts support. Read the Cost & Planning Guide to see how those items fit into the overall project.
Explore frames, glass and colours in the manufacturer’s configurator. Your choices stay on padelalba.com; send us the result and we’ll review it for your site.
Allow additional space for run-off, fencing and access.Inside the lines only. Run-off, fencing and access are additional. Court concept diagram.
For any of the four models, request the current foundation and anchoring drawings for the selected configuration. Review the ground, slab, levels, slope and drainage with the relevant technical specialists. An existing tennis court is a candidate for assessment, not a confirmed foundation. Keep delivery access and the complete footprint, including circulation and maintenance routes, in the same review.
Court price is not project price. Compare the model package, delivery to Western Canada, handling and storage, foundations, lighting and electrical work, installation, permits and surrounding works line by line. Ask whether each item is included, excluded or provisional. The budget guide explains how to make that comparison without assuming a universal installed price.
For an Alberta or Saskatchewan project, send the city or town and site setting with your preferred models. No model is assigned to a whole province simply from its name or photograph. Current documents and location-specific engineering must establish the configuration that can be proposed. Alberta and Saskatchewan enquiries use the current WCSI contact on (250) 815-5625.
Plan Your Padel Court in Alberta · Plan Your Padel Court in Saskatchewan.
Start with your site and intended use. Compare the appearance and package options, then confirm the footprint and technical requirements before making a selection.
Yes. WCSI can work through all four using a shared project brief and site information. Clubs, schools and developers can also request a comparison.
No. Suitability depends on the selected configuration and location-specific review. A model description does not replace that work.
LET’S PLAN YOUR NEXT STEPFREE QUOTE
Tell us what you’re planning and where.Tell us what you are planning and where. Photos or a site plan can follow.
